A GLOBAL CALL TO ACTION: FOR DEMOCRACY THAT DELIVERS PEACE AND PROSPERITY FOR ALL

FOR DEMOCRACY THAT DELIVERS PEACE AND PROSPERITY FOR ALL

As we approach the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, we, the undersigned organisations, call on governments and international institutions to reaffirm their commitment to a world free from nuclear weapons, honouring the demand of the Hibakusha and 2024 Nobel Peace laureate Nihon Hidankyo, and to prioritize sustainable development over militarism, people of collective power, accelerating military build-up and climate change, and diverting resources away from human development and peacebuilding.

As organisations from the peace, labour, economic justice, and climate movements, we share the belief that collective security can only be ensured through solidarity, by meeting the basic needs of all people.

Continue reading “A GLOBAL CALL TO ACTION: FOR DEMOCRACY THAT DELIVERS PEACE AND PROSPERITY FOR ALL”

IPB Press Release: For Democracy that Delivers Peace and Prosperity for All

27 July 2025, Berlin, Germany

 The International Peace Bureau (IPB), in cooperation with the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), Greenpeace, the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, Oxfam, and 350.org, has released a global call to action for nuclear and conventional disarmament, common security, and a prioritization of sustainable development over militarism.

Continue reading “IPB Press Release: For Democracy that Delivers Peace and Prosperity for All”

IPB Statement on Thailand-Cambodia Border Clashes

25 July 2025

The International Peace Bureau (IPB) expresses deep concern over the rising military clashes and political tensions between Thailand and Cambodia, which have resulted in the death of at least 15 civilians and the mass displacement of civilians from border areas. The escalation of long-standing tensions over the border risks further exacerbating civilian suffering and displacement.

The IPB calls for an immediate ceasefire and a return to diplomatic negotiations and conflict resolution as the only tools that can solve the crisis. Nationalist and militaristic rhetoric must be replaced by dialogue and common security. Moreover, IPB calls on ASEAN, particularly neighbour states, in the region and those with military ties to either party to encourage de-escalation and peaceful resolution.

Click on the button to load the content from docs.google.com.

Load content

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Neutrality Colloquium: A Call to Action for Active Neutrality & World Peace

Neutrality Colloquium: A Call to Action for Active Neutrality & World Peace

Geneva, Switzerland | June 26-27, 2025

The Neutrality Colloquium took place on June 26–27, 2025, in Geneva, Switzerland, bringing together 90 experts in diplomacy, international law, peacebuilding, and digitalization, from 27 countries across five continents—including Colombia, Argentina, Costa Rica, the USA, the DRC, Syria, Moldova, Ireland, Japan, and China. Held in hybrid format, the Colloquium served as a critical platform to explore and promote active neutrality as a strategy for peacebuilding, conflict prevention, and global stability amid growing geopolitical tensions, rising militarization, and ongoing humanitarian crises.

This gathering followed the First International Congress on Neutrality, which was held in Bogotá, Colombia, in April 2024. That congress marked a milestone, with participants from 25 countries laying the groundwork for a renewed global conversation on neutrality. The Geneva Colloquium was conceived as a smaller, expert-level forum to build upon that momentum and shape the vision for the Second International Congress on Neutrality, scheduled for 2026.

The event was jointly organized by a coalition of organizations committed to peace and disarmament: Global Veterans Peace Network (GVPN), World BEYOND War, Inter-University Network for Peace (REDIPAZ), International Peace Bureau (IPB), Transnational Institute, the Colombia Peace Agreement, and the Geneva Center for Neutrality, which hosted the gathering. Their collaboration was essential to the success of the Colloquium.

Over two days, participants engaged in five thematic focus groups:

  • Current Neutrality Practices
  • Digital Neutrality in the Age of Cyberwarfare and AI
  • Neutrality and Media
  • Building a New Non-Aligned Movement
  • Neutrality and Common Security in a Militarized World

Each group developed specific recommendations, which were integrated into the final outcomes of the Colloquium: a Modern Neutrality Final Declaration and an Action Agenda to Promote Active Neutrality.

The Declaration stresses that neutrality is not indifference. Rather, it is a strategic, principled approach to international relations—one that prioritizes peace over power projection, sovereignty over dominance, and cooperation over confrontation. In light of the alarming rise in military expenditures—including NATO’s recent commitment to allocate up to 5% of GDP to defense—the declaration calls for redirecting resources from warfare to social, ecological, and economic justice.

“Active neutrality is neither passive nor indifferent. It is a proactive, values-based stance, rooted in non-alignment, non-intervention, and demilitarization. In a context of rising geopolitical rivalries, climate breakdown, and digital warfare, active neutrality means to:

  • Prioritize peace over power projection
  • Promote sovereignty and self-determination, especially for the Global South
  • Reject participation in arms races, military alliances or military interventions
  • Promote dialogue, diplomacy and multilateralism
  • Invest in social, ecological and economic justice instead of war”

The Geneva Colloquium marked a significant step in global efforts to redefine and reinvigorate the role of neutrality in the 21st century. The inputs and outcomes of this event will directly inform the Second International Congress on Neutrality in 2026—ensuring that the principles of active neutrality continue to evolve as powerful tools for peace and justice in our increasingly polarized world.

You can read and download the documents below:
  1. Modern Neutrality Final Declaration
  2. Action Agenda to Promote Active Neutrality
  3. Press Release: Colloquium on Neutrality by Geneva Center for Neutrality Official
  • Modern Neutrality Final Declaration

  • Action Agenda to Promote Active Neutrality

  • Press Release: Colloquium on Neutrality by Geneva Center for Neutrality
Other Articles:

IPB Condemns U.S. Strikes on Iranian Nuclear Sites: An Illegal Escalation

Berlin, June 22, 2025

The International Peace Bureau (IPB) strongly condemns the United States’ recent military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Carried out in coordination with Israel, these attacks are a dangerous escalation that violates both international law and the U.S. Constitution—and brings the region closer to a devastating war.

Under international humanitarian law, nuclear facilities are protected due to the catastrophic risks they pose to civilians and the environment. Targeting them is inhuman and illegal. There is no credible evidence that Iran is currently pursuing nuclear weapons—U.S. intelligence has confirmed this repeatedly. Military action under these circumstances has no legal justification.

Domestically, the strikes also violate the U.S. Constitution, which grants Congress—not the President—the authority to declare war. Launching attacks without Congressional approval contradicts both the War Powers Resolution and the principles of democratic oversight.

This is more than a legal issue—it is a matter of global security. Attacking nuclear infrastructure risks the release of radioactive materials, retaliatory strikes, and rapid regional escalation. The consequences could be catastrophic—not just for Iran and the Middle East, but for the world. The USA and Iran should cease hostilities and return to serious, long-term negotiations.

NATO members must not follow a U.S. president who acts unlawfully, even within his own constitutional system. They have a responsibility to uphold international law and prevent escalation—not enable it. Silence or complicity only deepens the crisis.

There is no military solution to this crisis. IPB calls for an immediate end to all military operations, respect for international law, and return to diplomacy. Peace and common security can only be achieved through cooperation, not weapons.

Statements are available in English, French, and Russian. Check it below:

Statement in English

SOME WAY OUT OF HERE:Disarming Nuclear Powers & Preventing Proliferation

Report from Campaign for Peace Disarmament and Common Security shared via Newsletter | 07 May 2025

We were privileged to play the leading role in organizing “SOME WAY OUT OF HERE: Disarming Nuclear Powers & Preventing Proliferation” side event at the United Nations during the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty PrepCom. The session featured Yayoi Tsuchda, the Assistant General Secretary of Gensuiko, the Japan Council against A- & H- Bombs, Dr. Marco Marzo, Secretary General of the Brazilian-Argentine Agency for Accounting and Control of Nuclear Weapons; and John Burroughs the senior analyst and former Executive Director of the Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy.

Continue reading “SOME WAY OUT OF HERE:Disarming Nuclear Powers & Preventing Proliferation”

The world spent 2.71 trillion $ in the military in 2024, according to new data published today by SIPRI

  • Global military spending reached $2.7 billions, representing a 9.4% increase in 2024 compared to the previous year, according to SIPRI estimates—marking the largest rise in recent history, with a nearly 20% increase in just three years.
  • Over 100 peace organizations of 30 different countries call on governments to reduce military spending and instead address through cooperation and diplomacy the global challenges of our time.

Military approaches are gaining ground in the Middle East, with a 15% increase in military spending; in Europe, with an overall rise of 17%, led by Western Europe, which has increased its military budget by 24%; and in East and Southeast Asia, with increases of 7.5% and 7.8% respectively. NATO countries continue to lead globally, with their 32 members accounting for 55% of total global military spending—amounting to $1.506 trillion.
US military spending grew 5.7% to $997 billion, accounting for 37% of the global total by 2024. Russia, which increased its military spending by 38% in just one year ($149 billion), and Israel, with a 65% rise, are clearly committing to a war economy that supports political projects based on the use of military force.
China has increased its military budget for the thirty-third consecutive year, once again ranking as the second-largest military spender with $314 billion in 2024.

These are some of the key conclusions that can be drawn from the new global military spending data released today by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). The Global Days of Action on Military Spending (GDAMS), together with Centre Delàs of Peace Studies, analyzes the new military spending data and call for a reduction in global military expenditures, as well as for real efforts toward a new security architecture based on common security, disarmament, and international cooperation.

“The commitment to militarization by the major powers, along with international political uncertainty, distances the chances for peace in some of the main armed conflicts and increases the likelihood of opting for military solutions in regions with latent tensions. Furthermore, the arbitrary target of 2% of global GDP for military budgets is now being replaced by 3.5% or even 5%. This is boosting the business prospects of arms companies, and we know three out of four of the leading military industries are based in NATO countries,” analyzes Jordi Calvo, coordinator of Centre Delàs and the Global Campaign on Military Spending (GCOMS).

Military spending drives a militaristic Europe and moves peace further away from the continent.

EU member aggregate military spending reached 370 billion in 2024, the second highest after the US, and reaching a level in 2024 higher than the recorded at the end of the Cold War, with a 17% increase, primarily driven by Central and Eastern European countries. However, four of the five European countries that rank among the top 15 highest spenders are still Western; Germany, in particular, increased its military spending by 28% in 2024, becoming the largest investor in Central and Western Europe for the first time since reunification.

This goes hand in hand with the widespread discourse of European militarism in which the European Union itself is not left behind. In addition to the EU’s direct subsidies for the research, development, production, and acquisition of armaments, which would amount to nearly €1.5 billion in 2024 and €5 billion under the European Peace Facility, the European Commission has facilitated the use of civil programs for military projects, from the environmental LIFE program to transportation and regional funds, while encouraging private financial actors, including those involved in sustainable finance and the European Investment Bank, to invest in arms companies.

“Between the exacerbation of the global arms race and the defense of a contested hegemony, the militarization of the EU also poses a threat to the peace and security of its citizens. The recent plan for an additional €800 billion in military spending over the next four years will, sooner or later, lead to a reduction in public spending on healthcare, pensions, education, or the fight against climate change and its consequences,” warns Laëtitia Sedou, European advocacy coordinator for ENAAT, the European campaign against the arms trade

As military spending and defense initiatives grow, resources that could otherwise address pressing social challenges—such as climate change, public health, and poverty—are diverted towards furthering military capabilities. This shift toward militarization risks exacerbating tensions both within Europe and beyond, fueling instability and undermining efforts toward peaceful conflict resolution and cooperative international relations.

The 2025 GDAMS Appeal calls for an end to this arms race through drastic reductions of military spending.

Our campaign launched an Appeal at the beginning of this GDAMS period which has so far garnered more than 100 endorsements from organizations from 30 different countries all across the world (see the list here).  Together, we call on governments to reduce military spending and instead address through cooperation and diplomacy the global challenges of our time, which require all available resources. The Appeal also calls for efforts aimed at global disarmament, stopping the arms trade and ceasing arms shipments to countries in conflict, demanding governments that they use all existing means to push for a real ceasefire and an end to the genocide in Gaza.

Join us on April 28 for our biggest day of action!
For the occasion we’ve prepared this toolkit with infographics, a press release, materials, and post suggestions in this shared folder.

Statement by the International Peace Bureau on the Recent Violence in Syria’s Coastal Regions

The International Peace Bureau (IPB) expresses deep concern over the recent escalation of violence in Syria’s coastal regions, particularly affecting the Alawite community. This surge in conflict threatens the region’s fragile stability and underscores the urgent need for concerted international efforts to protect vulnerable populations and promote lasting peace.​

On March 6, 2025, coordinated attacks were initiated by loyalists of the ousted President Bashar al-Assad against government security forces in the coastal town of Jableh. This ambush resulted in the deaths of several security personnel and marked a significant escalation in the region. In the aftermath, insurgent groups disseminated misinformation, alleging that the new government was targeting coastal communities, thereby inflaming sectarian tensions.​

The government deployed reinforcements to the affected areas in response to the initial attacks. Clashes ensued, leading to severe casualties among the Alawite community, including children, the elderly, and civilians unaffiliated with the Assad regime. Between March 6 and March 8, Syria’s coastal regions, particularly the Latakia and Tartus provinces, experienced severe violence resulting in significant casualties among the Alawite community: initial estimations indicate the death of more than 1000 people, including hundreds of civilians, by extremists, foreign fighters, and Islamist groups.

  • Particular areas like Banyas, rural Latakia, and rural Japleh, have faced incidents of ethnical cleansing and revenge attacks on unarmed people.

Entire families—doctors, pharmacists, teachers, and innocent infants who had yet to experience life—have been mercilessly slaughtered. These tragic events have led to mass displacement, with thousands of Alawite civilians fleeing their homes. Many sought refuge at the Russian Khmeimim Air Base in Latakia province, seeking protection from the escalating violence. ​

International Response

The international community has expressed deep concern over these incidents, emphasizing the need for restraint and the protection of civilians to prevent further escalation and ensure regional stability.

  • United Nations: Geir Pedersen, the UN Special Envoy for Syria, has voiced alarm over the intense clashes and the resulting civilian casualties, emphasizing the imperative to protect non-combatants. ​
  • Neighboring and global Nations: Germany has urged Syrian authorities to avoid a “spiral of violence” following recent clashes. Similarly, Jordan’s foreign ministry supported Syria’s security measures and condemned any foreign interference that could destabilize the region. Additionally, the United Arab Emirates condemned the attacks and reiterated its support for Syria’s stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity. ​
  • Human Rights Organizations: Various NGOs have called for immediate investigations into reports of targeted killings based on religious affiliation, highlighting the potential for these acts to constitute war crimes or crimes against humanity. ​

The International Peace Bureau urgently calls upon the international community to:​

  1. Protect Civilians: Implement immediate measures to safeguard all civilians, particularly vulnerable communities such as the Alawites, from ongoing and future attacks.​
  2. Request the Syrian Government to take responsibility and protect innocent people: The new Syrian government should take decisive actions to halt current hostilities and prevent recurrence, ensuring that security operations are conducted within the bounds of international law and with utmost respect for human rights.​
  3. Ensure Accountability: Advocate for impartial investigations into alleged human rights violations, hold perpetrators accountable for crimes against humanity, deter future atrocities, and uphold justice.​
  4. Promote Dialogue: Facilitate inclusive dialogue among all Syrian factions to address underlying grievances, promote reconciliation, and build a sustainable peace framework.​

The international community must not stand idle in the face of such barbarity. Immediate action is imperative to protect the remaining Alawite population and to hold those responsible for these crimes accountable. The sanctity of human life and the principles of justice demand nothing less.

The IPB remains committed to supporting peace initiatives in Syria and stands in solidarity with all communities affected by this tragic conflict.

IPB Condemns the Violent Attack on Nouveaux Droits de l’Homme: Call for Accountability and Justice in Cameroon

Cameroon | 20 January 2025

The recent violent burglary at the offices of Nouveaux Droits de l’Homme (NDH-Cameroon) is a grave assault on human rights defenders and civil society. This act, aimed at silencing NDH’s critical work, highlights the growing threats faced by NGOs advocating for justice and freedom.

As the International Peace Bureau (IPB), we strongly condemn this attack and call for a thorough investigation by the authorities to ensure accountability in Cameroon. We urge all institutions to respect the rights of NGOs to operate free from fear and intimidation.

We stand in solidarity with NDH-Cameroon, including our IPB Council Member and Executive Director of NDH-Cameroon, Cyrille Roland Bechon, along with all its members and community. We reaffirm our commitment to defending the rights of all human rights defenders in the face of such challenges.

Continue reading “IPB Condemns the Violent Attack on Nouveaux Droits de l’Homme: Call for Accountability and Justice in Cameroon”

Investing in Peace: IPB’s Role in Challenging EU Militarization at the European Left’s Summer University

Article from August 2024

The European Left and its foundation transform!europe held their Summer University in Mieres del Camino (Spain) on July 11th, 12th, and 13th. Chloé Meulewaeter, the GCOMS coordinator at the International Peace Bureau (IPB), participated in the plenary titled: “Investing in Peace, not in War! An analysis of the militarization of the EU.

The session was moderated by Marga Ferré, Co-president of transform!europe (Spain), and featured several speakers: Claudia Haydt, Vice-president of the European Left and coordinator of its Peace Working Group (Germany); Gavin Rae, from the Nazprod Foundation (Poland); and Niamh Ní Bhriain, Programme Coordinator on War and Pacification at the Transnational Institute (Ireland).

During the plenary, Chloé Meulewaeter discussed the militarization of the European Union, highlighting how the arms industry lobby influences EU institutions to promote the narrative that “security is the precondition of any sustainability” in order to access the EU’s sustainable finances. Additionally, The Transnational Institute emphasized the urgent need to invest in peace rather than war, advocating for the isolation of Israel by cutting off funding to entities that perpetuate violence, in order to end the conflict in Gaza and promote true security.